模具论坛

 找回密码
 注册

扫一扫,微信登录

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

搜索
热搜: 冲压 注塑 求助
    回车查看更多
    论坛可能已存在您要发布的主题帖 关闭
      楼主: works007

      [分享][转帖]English Grammar

      [复制链接]
       楼主| 发表于 2004-11-3 09:18:00 | 显示全部楼层
      <P><b>Demonstrative adjectives and pronouns</b></P><P><B> </B></P><P><B><U>Demonstrative adjectives</U></B></P><P>Demonstrative adjectives have two singular forms (<B>this</B>, <B>that</B>) and two plural forms (<B>these</B>, <B>those</B>). These adjectives are used to designate proximity to an object, or to distinguish between an object that is close (in time or space) and one that is more remote. Usually "<B>this</B>" and "<B>these</B>" signal proximity, while "<B>that</B>" and "<B>those</B>" suggest distance:</P><UL><LI><U>These</U> books are too expensive. <LI><U>This</U> car is responsive. <LI><U>That</U> man irritates me! <LI><U>This</U> hotel is more expensive than <U>that</U> one. </LI></UL><P><B> </B></P><P><B><U>Demonstrative pronouns</U></B></P><P>Demonstrative pronouns have the same form as the demonstrative adjectives, but are used without the nouns to which they refer. In the singular, when designating a specific object, the pronoun "<B>one</B>" is often added:</P><UL><LI>These tomatoes are fresher than <U>those</U>. <LI>These are better than <U>those</U>. <LI>Would you like a little of <U>this</U>? <LI><U>That</U> strikes me as really weird! <LI>The book is more interesting than <U>that one</U>.  <P><B>In front of a relative pronoun, </B>the demonstrative pronoun becomes "<B>the one</B>" or "<B>the ones</B>" (when speaking of things), or "<B>he / she who</B>", "<B>they who</B>" (when speaking of people):</P><LI>This film is <U>the one</U> that you hated so much. <LI><U>He who</U> eats well works well. <LI>This pen is <U>the one</U> with which the President signed the new law. </LI></UL>
       楼主| 发表于 2004-11-3 09:19:00 | 显示全部楼层
      <P><b>Direct and indirect discourse</b></P><P>When one reports what others have said word for word, this is called "direct discourse." It is generally signaled by the presence of quoation marks:</P><UL><LI>Philippe said, "I'll come if I have the time." <LI>My roommate said, "Clean the place up, or get out of here!" </LI></UL><P>When one paraphrases the words of others, writing them so as to avoid direct quotation, this is called "indirect discourse." Indirect discourse entails certain changes:</P><P><B>A.</B> Quotation marks are not used:</P><BLOCKQUOTE><B>direct discourse:</B> He told me, "You're stupid"
      <B>indirect discourse:</B> He told me that I was stupid.</BLOCKQUOTE><P><B>B.</B> When the verb in the reported discourse is conjugated, is it generally preceded by "<B>that</B>"; however, the inclusion of "<B>that</B>" is optional</P><UL><LI>She said that she would be late. <LI><B>OR: </B>She said she would be late. <LI>They informed us that the plane was delayed. <LI><B>OR: </B>They informed us the plane was delayed.<B> </B> </LI></UL><P><B>C. </B>Imperative forms, when recounted in indirect discourse, generally become infinitive constructions:</P><BLOCKQUOTE><B>direct discourse: </B>He told me, "Write to me."
      <B>indirect discourse:</B> He told me to write him.<B> </B><P><B>direct discourse: </B>I told them, "Get out of here!"
      <B>indirect discourse:</B> I told them to get out of here.<B> </B></P></BLOCKQUOTE><P><B>D.</B> When a quotation is put in indirect discourse, care must be taken to verify that verb tenses reflect the change in temporal context:</P><BLOCKQUOTE><B>direct discourse:</B> She said, "I <U>will be</U> on time."
      <B>indirect discourse:</B> She said she <U>would be</U> on time. <P><B>direct discourse:</B> When he called he said, "I <U>am</U> at the airport"
      <B>indirect discourse:</B> When he called he said he <U>was</U> at the airport.</P></BLOCKQUOTE>
      发表于 2004-11-3 12:18:00 | 显示全部楼层
      <P>PERFECT</P>
      发表于 2004-11-3 12:35:00 | 显示全部楼层
      <P>english corner ,english about mould,do you have?</P><P>give me </P>
      yongshao 该用户已被删除
      发表于 2004-11-3 12:44:00 | 显示全部楼层
      提示: 作者被禁止或删除 内容自动屏蔽
      yongshao 该用户已被删除
      发表于 2004-11-3 12:46:00 | 显示全部楼层
      提示: 作者被禁止或删除 内容自动屏蔽
      dianying01 该用户已被删除
      发表于 2004-11-3 16:47:00 | 显示全部楼层
      提示: 作者被禁止或删除 内容自动屏蔽
      dianying01 该用户已被删除
      发表于 2004-11-3 16:48:00 | 显示全部楼层
      提示: 作者被禁止或删除 内容自动屏蔽
      river_fish 该用户已被删除
      发表于 2004-11-4 07:55:00 | 显示全部楼层
      提示: 作者被禁止或删除 内容自动屏蔽
      发表于 2004-11-4 16:30:00 | 显示全部楼层
      <P>it seemed that this is a mould forum, anyway, thanks</P>
      发表于 2004-11-4 20:21:00 | 显示全部楼层
      <P>早该进修英语了</P>
      发表于 2004-11-4 22:30:00 | 显示全部楼层
      well done
       楼主| 发表于 2004-11-5 09:14:00 | 显示全部楼层
      <P><b>Causative constructions</b></P><P>When one does not carry out an action oneself but rather has the action done by someone else, this is expressed by a <U>causative construction</U>. In English it is the verb "<B>to have</B>" that introduces the causative. The model will generally be: "<B>to have</B>" (conjuguated) <B>+ direct objet </B>(noun or pronoun) <B>+ principal verb</B> (in its past participle form):</P><UL><LI>We'll <U>have a monument erected</U> on this site. <LI>I <U>had my hair cut</U>. </LI></UL><P>When one wishes to designate the agent of the action (the person who has carried out the described action), there are two possibilities:</P><P>1. -- "<B>to have</B>" (conjuguated) <B>+ direct objet </B>(noun or pronoun) <B>+ principal verb</B> (in its past participle form) + "<B>by</B>" + <B>agent </B>(usually not as a pronoun):</P><UL><LI>The professor <U>had the work done by his lab assistants</U>. <LI>I <U>had it done by my employees</U>. </LI></UL><P>2. -- "<B>to have</B>" (conjuguated) <B>+ agent </B>(as a direct object noun or pronoun) <B>+ principal verb</B> (in its infinitive form) + <B>the object </B>(also in the form of a direct object noun or pronoun)</P><UL><LI>The professor <U>had his students write an essay</U>. <LI>I <U>had him do it</U>. </LI></UL><P><B>Note: </B>Especially in spoken English, the verb "<B>to get</B>" often replaces "<B>to have</B>," in which case "<B>to</B>" is added to the infinitive (but not before past participles). This construction also suggests that it may be (or have been) difficult to produce a certain reaction on the part of the agent:</P><UL><LI>We'll <U>get</U> a monument erected on this site. <LI>The professor <U>got</U> his students to write an essay. </LI></UL><P>When one wishes to express a change in temperament or in general conditions, it is the construction "<B>to make + adjectif</B>" which is used:</P><UL><LI>That letter <U>made</U> her <U>sad</U>. <LI>He <U>makes</U> me <U>furious</U>! <LI>That new problem <U>made</U> negotiations really <U>hard</U>! </LI></UL>
      发表于 2004-11-6 08:49:00 | 显示全部楼层
      GOOD~~!!
      发表于 2004-11-8 16:30:00 | 显示全部楼层
      Thank
      azhong 该用户已被删除
      发表于 2004-11-10 11:02:00 | 显示全部楼层
      提示: 作者被禁止或删除 内容自动屏蔽
       楼主| 发表于 2004-11-15 13:57:00 | 显示全部楼层
      <P><b>The imperative</b></P><P>Imperatives are used to issue commands. They use the infinitive of verbs (dropping the word "<B>to</B>"); in the first person plural ("<B>we</B>"), the infinitive is preceded by "<B>let's</B>" (or: "<B>let us</B>"):</P><UL><LI>Speak! <LI>Finish your homework! <LI>Let's eat! <LI>Close the door! </LI></UL><P>The negative imperative is formed by placing "<B>don't</B>" (or "<B>do not</B>") before the imperative form; in the first person plural one uses "<B>let's not</B>" (or "<B>let us not</B>") :</P><UL><LI>Let's not forget who helped us. <LI>Don't leave me! <LI>Don't walk on the grass! <LI>Please don't eat the daisies! </LI></UL><P>The imperative has no effect on the word order of the rest of the sentence.</P>
       楼主| 发表于 2004-11-15 14:02:00 | 显示全部楼层
      <P><b>Causative constructions</b></P><P>When one does not carry out an action oneself but rather has the action done by someone else, this is expressed by a <U>causative construction</U>. In English it is the verb "<B>to have</B>" that introduces the causative. The model will generally be: "<B>to have</B>" (conjuguated) <B>+ direct objet </B>(noun or pronoun) <B>+ principal verb</B> (in its past participle form):</P><UL><LI>We'll <U>have a monument erected</U> on this site. <LI>I <U>had my hair cut</U>. </LI></UL><P>When one wishes to designate the agent of the action (the person who has carried out the described action), there are two possibilities:</P><P>1. -- "<B>to have</B>" (conjuguated) <B>+ direct objet </B>(noun or pronoun) <B>+ principal verb</B> (in its past participle form) + "<B>by</B>" + <B>agent </B>(usually not as a pronoun):</P><UL><LI>The professor <U>had the work done by his lab assistants</U>. <LI>I <U>had it done by my employees</U>. </LI></UL><P>2. -- "<B>to have</B>" (conjuguated) <B>+ agent </B>(as a direct object noun or pronoun) <B>+ principal verb</B> (in its infinitive form) + <B>the object </B>(also in the form of a direct object noun or pronoun)</P><UL><LI>The professor <U>had his students write an essay</U>. <LI>I <U>had him do it</U>. </LI></UL><P><B>Note: </B>Especially in spoken English, the verb "<B>to get</B>" often replaces "<B>to have</B>," in which case "<B>to</B>" is added to the infinitive (but not before past participles). This construction also suggests that it may be (or have been) difficult to produce a certain reaction on the part of the agent:</P><UL><LI>We'll <U>get</U> a monument erected on this site. <LI>The professor <U>got</U> his students to write an essay. </LI></UL><P>When one wishes to express a change in temperament or in general conditions, it is the construction "<B>to make + adjectif</B>" which is used:</P><UL><LI>That letter <U>made</U> her <U>sad</U>. <LI>He <U>makes</U> me <U>furious</U>! <LI>That new problem <U>made</U> negotiations really <U>hard</U>! </LI></UL>
       楼主| 发表于 2004-11-16 15:10:00 | 显示全部楼层
      <P><b>The imperative</b></P><P>Imperatives are used to issue commands. They use the infinitive of verbs (dropping the word "<B>to</B>"); in the first person plural ("<B>we</B>"), the infinitive is preceded by "<B>let's</B>" (or: "<B>let us</B>"):</P><UL><LI>Speak! <LI>Finish your homework! <LI>Let's eat! <LI>Close the door! </LI></UL><P>The negative imperative is formed by placing "<B>don't</B>" (or "<B>do not</B>") before the imperative form; in the first person plural one uses "<B>let's not</B>" (or "<B>let us not</B>") :</P><UL><LI>Let's not forget who helped us. <LI>Don't leave me! <LI>Don't walk on the grass! <LI>Please don't eat the daisies! </LI></UL><P>The imperative has no effect on the word order of the rest of the sentence.</P>
       楼主| 发表于 2004-11-17 16:03:00 | 显示全部楼层
      <P><b>Partitive article:"some"</b></P><P>When the article "<B>some</B>" appears before a plural noun it functions like an indefinite article:</P><UL><LI>He has <U>some</U> tickets for the game. <LI><U>Some</U> students decided not to attend the class. </LI></UL><P>However, when "<B>some</B>" appears before a <U>singular</U> noun, it is being used as a <U>partitive</U>. This is to say that a part of something is indicated, or a partial (or indeterminate) quantity is referred to. It is often used after verbs of possession or consumption:</P><UL><LI>Do you have <U>some</U> time? <LI>We're going to buy <U>some</U> milk. <LI>I heard <U>some</U> bad news. <LI>She has <U>some</U> money to spend. <LI>Would you like <U>some</U> help ? <P><B>Note: </B>After expressions of quantity, the partitive article is <U>not</U> used:</P><LI>Students buy a lot of pastries. <LI>Today people have more activities than before. </LI></UL><P>In negative expressions, the partitive article "<B>some</B>" generally becomes "<B>any</B>" (this change will also occur in negative interrogatives):</P><UL><LI>She doesn't have <U>any</U> money. <LI>They didn't have <U>any</U> milk. <LI>Don't you have <U>any</U> money? </LI></UL><P>The word "<B>any</B>" is not strictly necessary in the negative,and it may often be omitted:</P><UL><LI>I never have accidents. <LI>They didn't have milk. </LI></UL>
      您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

      本版积分规则

      关闭

      招聘信息 上一条 /5 下一条

      关闭

      求职信息 上一条 /5 下一条

      关闭

      技术求助 上一条 /5 下一条

      QQ|小黑屋|手机版|模具论坛 ( 浙ICP备15037217号 )

      GMT+8, 2025-8-5 03:15

      Powered by Discuz! X3.4

      © 2001-2013 Comsenz Inc.

      快速回复
      返回顶部
      返回列表
       
      客服电话:0577-61318188
      模具论坛交流群:
      模具论坛交流群
      工作时间:
      08:30-17:30